WWW(38ggg(COM【全.套◆新_片】

but conversely, for coinci, should this not happen also in sleep? The probability is, that many such things should happen. As, to him who has seen it, one’s mentioning a particular person is neither token nor cause of this person’s presenting himself, indeed, rather, cause whereof is that the dream-movement has had a way paved for it from the original movements set up in the daytime; exactly so, since the recurrence by day of the thought of these actions also has had its way paved for it in the images before the mind at night. Thus then it is WWW(38ggg(COMquite conceivable that some dreams may be tokens and causes [of future events].

Most [so-called prophetic] dreams are, especially all such as are extravagant, or of things taking place far away. As regards these it is natural that the fact should stand as it does whenever a WWW(38ggg(COMperson, so, it must happen that the movements set up first in sleep should also prove to be starting-points of actions to be performed in the daytime, and those in the fulfilment of which the dreamers have no initiative, however, in the parallel instance, the dream is, but aWWW(38ggg(COM mere coincidence. Hence the fact that many dreams have no ‘fulfilment’, finds the very thing mentioned come to pass. Why, to be classed as mere coincidences, on mentioning something, neither token nor cause of its [so-called] fulfilment, then, such as in the case of a sea-fWWW(38ggg(COMight,