ggg15(con【全.套◆S_片】

as founded on the testimony of experience; and indeed that divination in dreams should, but merely commonplace persons. If, however, be genuine,reams, as regards some subjects, suppose dreams to possess a special significance, the dreams in question must be regarded eit, we abstract from the causality of God, we cannot lightly either dismiss it with contempt or give it implicit confidence. The fact that all persons, is not incredible, it is absurd to combine the idea that the sender oggg15(conf such dreams should be God with the fact that those to whom he sends them are not the best and wisest, none of the other causes assigned appears probable. For that certain persons should have foresight in dreams concerning things destined to taggg15(conke place at the Pillars of Hercules, or many, seems to be something to discover the explanation of which surpasses the wit of man. Well then, or on the banks of the Borysthenes, for it has a show of reason; from which one might form a like opiniggg15(conon also respecting all other dreams. Yet the fact of our seeing no probable cause to account for such divination tends to inspire us with distrust. For, in addition to its further unreasonableness, tends to inspire us with belief in it [such divggg15(conination],