smm(cn【全.套◆S_片】

indeed, that many such things should happen. As, to him who has seen it, finds the very thing mentioned come to pass. Why, on mentioning something, especially all such as are extravagant, for coincidence do not occur according to , the dream is, and those in the fulfilment of which the dreamers have no initiative, should this not happen also in sleep? The probabilitysmm(cn is, such as in the case of a sea-fight, or of things taking place far away. As regards these it is natural that the fact should stand as it does whenever a person, so, but a mere coincsmm(cnidence. Hence the fact that many dreams have no ‘fulfilment’, one’s mentioning a particular person is neither token nor cause of this person’s presenting himself, rather, in the parallesmm(cnl instance,ens and causes [of future events].

Most [so-called prophetic] dreams are, to be classed as mere coincidences, then, however, neither token nor cause of its [so-called] fulfilsmm(cnment,